Avenue-X--Jenna Banks Presents One Sided Data After Accusing Someone's Numbers of Being One Sided

[quote]Originally posted by Jenna Banks

Okay....this is getting boring.

After providing clear FACTS and links from reliable, dependable sources, you still are unable to comprehend the truth.

Actually READ the articles from the links I provided and then maybe you might be armed with a valid argument.

I have no problem with people disagreeing with me... but have some substance behind your point of view.

Sorry...spewing random, unattested for numbers dosen't prove anything. Neither does your OPINION (although it is entertaining at 2am).

~Jenna Banks [/quote]

Don't expect other people to accept your "facts" if you reject theirs. It doesn't work that way. This is getting boring to you, because the opposition refuses to give up. What you're really saying is that you're getting bored waiting for the opposition to give up.

Now, let's use your own words in response to you:

"I have the right to make my own educated conclusion about my Nation, just as you do." -- Jenna Banks

You said it.

The opposition has a right to come to its own educated conclusion, just as you have a right to come to yours. This post shows that you just said that for the sake of saying something. It shows that you didn't mean it.

You provided two links. One clearly didn't support what you were trying to argue. I read the information that those links talked about. I didn't come away with the same "conclusion" that you came to. I saw something different.

Your first link actually worked against you. You argued against political affiliation. The link that you used resorted to political affiliation.

Your first link clearly showed that the Democrat Controlled Congress (2008)... were making it hard for our oil companies to do something about raising supply in the long run... thus reducing gas prices in the long run.

That first link didn't help your case, but enforced your opponent's argument.

The second link highlighted the FED defending their actions with regards to interest rate decision. All the things that's mentioned in the link continued to happen even during the "growth" that followed the recession.

You're demanding that the opposition read your links. Yet, you're not willing to entertain the opposition's facts and data.

Contrary to what you said, you have problems with people disagreeing with you.

It's like you're trying to force them to agree with you. Your follow on actions emphasizes your attempts to get someone to come to your conclusions. They show that you want them to agree with you, or to "give up," the fight.

This is what your actions are telling me. Your actions contradict your claims.

When it comes to not having problems with disagreement, you don't walk the walk. The person that actually walks the walk in this is Lunatic Fringe.

I also noticed how you went from just expressing an opinion to "making an educated conclusion." You don't apply the latter to your opposition. That's very telling.