HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Embellishing One's Service

 September 11, 2001. That's the date that changed America.

Sky high patriotism ruled the day. Everybody loved a person in uniform, or someone that used to wear it. The military joined airport security when it came to streamlined searches. They joined the airline staff when it came to seat upgrades. Society did its best to extend their gratitude to those that served.

"No, don't worry about it, I've got you!" 

This phrase repeated itself as members of the public showed their gratitude by paying for the military member's meals. What about the other interaction barriers that people normally came across? They melted when someone in uniform faced that barrier.

Service Members humbly appreciated that gratitude.

But, they weren't the only ones. This group's numbers went up. People with wild imaginations and large egos came right out of the woodwork. This was a breed of people that showed up on a regular basis, usually on the tail end of a completed military operation... or a blockbuster military film.

Phonies and embellishers populated this new group. These were people that took advantage of a grateful public. They did it to compensate for low self esteem. They got intoxicated from the attention they received. This intoxication helped them forget what they felt were their failures.

Others did it for commercial gain. Enter one of the characters from HBO's "Cathouse" series; "Air Force Amy."

A client reads her information and what does he get? A hot woman, who's also an Air Force veteran, that caters to members of a grateful public. This is a no brainer from a business standpoint. What's one of the ideas behind this? If you turned Air Force Amy down, you don't support the troops. If you see Air Force Amy, you're showing appreciation for the military.

Air Force Aimee took every opportunity to mention her Air Force credentials. As an E-4, she earned the Meritorious Service Medal. She earned the John Levitow Award. On her blog, she lists it as the highest award achievable. On Judge Pirro, she claimed that it was the highest award in the military. In fact, she had a laundry list of her accomplishments memorized.

On Judge Pirro, she went on about these accomplishments, with a straight face, as if she were reciting a poem.

Are these claims believable? I saw more holes in her story the more I read her claims. Her stories took on the semblance of a fishnet. Let's start with her profile on the website, "Together we served," under the name "Donice Armstrong."

Her accomplishments, on "Together we served," on her website, and on Wikipedia, fall under three categories; basic duties, who she "trained," and her "stellar" achievements.

HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Her Awards and Accomplishments may not Match her Records

She claims to have served a full term with an Honorable Discharge. Her accomplishments included:

* Being an instructor for Air Base Ground Defense
* Anti Terrorism Specialist
* Law enforcement and security

She worked with the following entities in the above capacity:

* Diplomatic Security Service
* The office of Special Investigations
* Naval Intelligence
* Army Special Forces
* Navy SEALs (she spells it "Seals.")
* Thousands of "sexy" and "hard bodied" men and women of all branches, US and Foreign

She claims the following awards and accomplishments:

* Meritorious Service Medal
* Airman of the Year
* Woman of the Year
* S.P. of the Year"
* Promoted before her peers two times
* Receipt of the John Levitow Award

She claims participation in the following world event:

* Was a member of the detail that accompanied Marcos out of the Philippines

She lists Senior Airman as her highest rank, so she was an E-4.

This is important for a lot of reasons, especially when this is matched against the above claims. Here are the times in service requirement for promotion, based on "About.com."

Promotion to E-2 in the Air Force: 6 months.

Promotion to E-3 in the Air Force: 10 months

Promotion to E-4 in the Air Force: 36 months

That works out to 4 years and 4 months. But, she claims to be promoted below the zone a couple of times. This would've put her under 4 years, where she would've been up for an NCO rank. Her profile has her service dates running from 1984 to 1989, five years.

With her accomplishments, to include numerous "of the year" awards, John Levitow Award, and her Meritorious Service Medal, she could've had "head of the line" standing for selection to E-5. The John Levitow Award is awarded for excellence in both, leadership and academics. This is awarded during a leadership course.

Here's something else to consider. If she was at a leadership course, to earn the John Levitow Award, she would've had another award... which doesn't show up on her ribbon rack.

If she accomplished all that she said she accomplished, she could've been discharged as an E-5. The above time in service requirements could've been different from the 80s. But she still could've made E-5 in 5 years, given her claimed performance track record.

She served 5 years and got out as a Senior Airman; this shows that she isn't all that she claimed.  In reality, she could've been average, or slightly above average. She definitely wouldn't be the front runner that she's boasting about.

HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Claims to Have Trained 44 Men "at a Time" to "Stay Alive" While Defending a Runway

On Judge Pirro, she claimed that as an Air Base Ground Defense Instructor, she took 44 men out to the field for two weeks at a time to teach them how to defend a runway.

Let's step back and look at what she has claimed so far.

She's an E-4, not yet a non-commissioned officer (NCO). She claimed to have worked with Special Forces elements from other branches of the military. She takes these people "out in the field" for two weeks... to defend a runway. She's got less than 5 years in the military. As a Senior Airman, she's training people with combat related specialties.

Air Base Ground Defense is an Air Force counterpart to the Navy's Master at Arms and the Army's Military Police. Their job is all spectrum of base defense. This includes perimeter defense in the combat theater. Prior to 1996, the Air Force's security detail had two main functions: Law enforcement, and force protection. After the Khobar Tower's Bombing, their job took on more complex roles.

This transformation caused multiple specialties to form within this job specialty. Air Force Specialty Codes were created for these different specialties. Air Force Amy, who served from 1984 to 1989 (or 1985 to 1990), claims AFSC of 3P0X1; which falls under Security Forces. There was an "A" or "B" after that code. "A" was for dog handling, and "B" was for basic arms.

Combat arms specialties from other branches, especially the Special Forces, already have their own procedures for security on a runway. These procedures include 360 security after disembarking from the bird, proceeding to a rendezvous point after disembarking from the bird, or setting up security away from the bird in a designated area/sector.

Those are just a few examples of how they'd tackle security on a runway.

If an entire runway needs defending, it's usually in the process of securing an enemy air base. That's when you set up defensive positions in covered and concealed areas overlooking the runway... as well as avenues of approaches to the runway.

Air Force Amy would've been involved with routine force protection around an air field... in a garrison environment... in the United States.

You generally don't waste Special Forces or conventional infantry units for that duty. That's base security's domain. Since she operated in a garrison environment, there would've been no need for trainees to be out in the field for two weeks.

HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Air Force Veterans Hint on Reality...

A veteran of the Air Force's Air Base Ground Defense specialty, username "joenoplis," started a thread on the military.com forums. An Airman, prior Soldier, replied, username Stonewall 11. Although he had that specialty, he didn't have to attend the AFSC qualification course. His being prior Army removed the need for him to go to that class.

Why would an E-4 be training other services in Air Base Ground Defense procedures... when Soldiers transferring into the Air Force got a waiver from attending the school for her AFSC?

As the thread progressed, Stonewall 11 claimed that their classes, including land navigation and other hands on training, were done by power point. Joenoplis replied that during his time, they spent 5 days out in the field doing land navigation and other combat related activities. Raz64 joined the thread, and talked about walking his fire team into a heard of cows during night landnav.

The posters mentioned "two weeks," as Air Force Amy did on Judge Pirro. These posters talked about resident tents and huts. That's not exactly "out in the field."

Now, the Air Force does use Senior Airmen as instructors. They're usually top notch. But, being a woman, Air Force Amy would've been part of a cadre that took men out for two weeks at a time. It wouldn't make sense; however, for an Airman to teach basic combat skills to people whose profession involved ground combat.

As a member of the military police, you're a defacto "anti terrorist" specialist. Posts/Bases in the US have security levels that meet the expected level of terrorist/security threat. Everybody in the military receives anti terrorist training as a general military requirement.

Now, Judge Pirro laughed at Air Force Amy's comment of taking 44 men, and the concept behind that. Air Force Amy was being humorous through all of this. She finished her statement with, "...taught them how to stay alive, and to stay on top of the situation!"

Again, let's look at who her implied students were: SEALs, Army SF, Marines, and hard bodied men and women of the different branches of both, the US and foreign militaries. If combat troops need an Air Force E-4 to teach them how to "stay alive" and to "stay on top of the situation," we're in massive trouble.

The school that they talked about on the military.com thread would've been considered "child's play/kindergarten" by Combat Arms and Special Forces.

Here's the reality... Air Force Amy was not an Air Base Ground Defense instructor. She did not take 44 men out in the field for two weeks at a time.

If she were an instructor, she would've been part of a cadre that took people out in the field, for those 4 or 5 days. The students would've been other Airman. They may have also been brand new Marines, Soldiers, and Sailors needing military police type training in addition to what they got from their parent service. She would've done most her teaching in the classroom.

HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Not Highly Decorated, Possibly Violated the Stolen Valor Act

Air Force Amy has made this comment on Judge Pirro, and similar comments on the internet:

"I'm a highly decorated veteran of the United States Air Force" -- Air Force Amy 

Her ribbon rack, on her profile, had two rows, three ribbons each:

* Meritorious Service Medal
* Air Force Good Conduct Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Air Force Longevity Award
* Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon
* Air Force Training Ribbon.

Her AFSC badge sits above the rack.

She needs more than that to be considered "highly decorated." Let's go back in time and see her while she was still on active duty. Her uniform would've shown two rows of ribbons... if she earned all of them. It's painfully obvious that she didn't earn two of the above decorations.

First up, the National Defense Service Medal...

Air Force Amy's profile shows her as being born in 1965. She would've been 20 years old on 1985. Her profile has her service dates as 1984 to 1989.

Take a look at these National Defense Service Medal qualifying periods:

* January 1, 1961 to August 4, 1974: Vietnam War
* August 2, 1990 to November 30, 1995: Gulf War
* September 11, 2001 until to be determined: Global War on Terrorism.

It doesn't matter if she served from 1984 to 1989, or from 1985 to 1990. She didn't serve during a qualifying period for the National Defense Service Medal. This means that she doesn't rate the National Defense Service Medal. That's a blatant error that even a Day One Private wouldn't make.

Next up, the Meritorious Service Medal...

Service members that earn this award have a common trait. The vast majority are senior NCOs and senior officers. Based on her profile, Air Force Amy wouldn't have received that medal. She would've gotten the Air Force Commendation Medal instead.

So, if she were in the Air Force, she more than likely would've just had 4 ribbons on that rack.

HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Story Doesn't Match Retention or Out Processing Procedures

She switches from her accomplishments to why she extended in the Air Force. She claims that she extended for two reasons. The first one was for the convenience of the government and the second one was to get herself on US soil prior to her being discharged... less they drop her off at a port of entry with a good luck note.

Convenience of the government comes into play when it comes to extending one's contract.
Every service member enlists for a specific time period. At the end of this contract, the member could either reenlist, or process for separation.

What could stop this from happening? Stop loss.

Stop loss is an extension at the government's convenience. If not enough people are coming in to maintain minimum troop levels, the government could extend some service member's contracts.

For the convenience of the government indicates an involuntary act.

Also, when the military processes people for discharge, they make sure that these service members can make it to the place they entered on active duty. If these service members are overseas, they could also be transferred to a stateside military installation to be processed for discharge.

If Air Force Amy joined the Air Force from her home state of Ohio, that's where the Air Force would've sent her to. They wouldn't have stranded her at a port of entry.

"I traded sexual favors with an airman at base ops and got transferred to Nellis AFB in Las Vegas." -- Air Force Amy

"Base ops" is base operations. They're in charge of operations that take place on the base.

The people in charge of issuing Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders work at the human resources command... or equivalent. That's if the Air Force issues PCS orders similar to the Navy and the Army.

Having sex with someone at base operations isn't going to do much to get you transferred to another post... unless there's a possible criminal act and one must be transferred for one's protection.

Now, what were her reasons for getting out?

On Judge Pirro when asked how she got to the Bunny Ranch:

"And because all the jobs I'm qualified for, I would have had to carry a gun for a living. I didn't want to carry a gun for a living anymore. I looked at a station in Las Vegas in Nevada and I was like the bright light and the pretty cloths and the glamour" -- Air Force Amy on Judge Pirro

On the internet:

"I decided to separate from the military because my commander would not allow me to cross train into another field (which was my right) because I was too valuable to him with the training I had and I couldn't get a reenlistment bonus in the career field I was in so I gave an ultimatum to my commander asking him to please either cross train me into another field or give me a reenlistment bonus or else I would separate and go to work in one of the legal brothels forty five minutes away." -- Air Force Amy on her website

Followed by this:

"I didn't get my cross training or reenlistment bonus so I decided to act on my own ultimatum, with a few wine coolers under my belt; I made my way out to the Chicken Ranch." -- Air Force Amy on her website

These are two contradictory statements.

Her first comment wasn't exactly true. Military Police carry a weapon while on duty. However, while not on duty, they turned their weapons in.

She bragged about being Air Base Ground Defense, and taking all these men to the field for two weeks. She bragged about being a member of the detail that escorted Marcos out of the Philippines... yet she claims she didn't want to carry guns for a living.

On the second one, ultimatums generally don't work with Commanding Officers (CO). She also makes this sound like she's talking to her commanding officer.

If the Air Force is like the other branches of the service, Air Force Amy would've talked to a Career Counselor NCO. This person's job is retention, getting people to re-enlist. Also, if the Air Force were like the other services, the CO can't guarantee a bonus. The CO also can't guarantee her a cross training opportunity.

With the Navy and the Army, whether you could reclassify or not depends on the needs of the service.

If you want to train into a new MOS, that MOS has to have a real need for new people. On the other side of the coin, if your MOS was undermanned, there's a good chance that your branch manager wouldn't release you. Worse case, your MOS is neither overmanned nor undermanned. You could still be denied MOS reclassification.

I'm guessing that this concept is also applicable with the Air Force.

Also, if her CO found her to be "valuable," he would've tried to pull strings for her. It appeared that he didn't do this. This'd contradict her claims that she was valuable in the first place... or it could just be that he didn't have the power to get her wishes accomplished.

She also talked about "changing fields." The Navy uses something close to "cross-rate into another rate/rating," and the Army uses something close to "re-class into a new MOS." The Air Force might use something along those same lines. Changing fields sounds like something one does in the private sector.

HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Her Conflicting Duty Station Claims

Now, let's scrutinize her list of assignments.

Her profile lists her at Air Combat Command from 1983 to 1987. That's pretty impressive considering that Air Combat Command didn't get activated until June 1, 1992. Keep in mind that she claims to have served from 1984 to 1989.

Then we have this:

"I didn't get my cross training or reenlistment bonus so I decided to act on my own ultimatum, with a few wine coolers under my belt; I made my way out to the Chicken Ranch. I actually applied for work at the Chicken Ranch three months prior to my honorable discharge and began working there afterwards in February of 1990." -- Air Force Amy

Assuming that she got out in January, 1990, Air Combat Command got activated two years after she got out.

Her second assignment places her at the 554th Security Police Squadron from 1983 to 1987. This would've put her at Nellis Air Force Base at Las Vegas in 1986... when Marcos got escorted out of the Philippines.

Her third assignment also places her with the 57th Fighter Weapons Wing from 1983 to 1987. Again, this would've put her at Nellis Air Force Base at Las Vegas. The unit was an Air Force counterpart to the Navy's "Top Gun."

She also claims to have served with the United States Pacific Air Forces from 1984 to 1989. This would've placed her at Hickam Air Force Base, in Hawaii, during the same period she was assigned to Nellis Air Force Base.

She may have attempted to use this to back her claims that she was part of the Marcos Detail. So, how does the Marcos flight out of the Philippines go?

From the Lost Angeles Times, February 26, 1986:

"The U.S. Air Force C-141 transport carrying Marcos and his family to Hawaii landed at Hickam Air Force Base at 12:42 p.m. PST. The plane carried the party of 89 including his wife, Imelda, three children and three grandchildren from Anderson Air Force Base in Guam earlier in the day." -- LA Times Feb 26, 1986.

The C-141 flew from Clark Air Force Base, The Philippines, to Anderson Air Force Base, Guam. Then it flew from Anderson Air Force Base, Guam, to Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii. If the Air Force operates like the Navy and the Army, two scenarios are possible.

The first security element boards with Marcos and family in Clark Air Force Base. This security detachment is based out of Clark. They ride the plane to Guam. While at Guam, a security element, based in Guam, gets assigned to the Marcos plane. They ride that plane to Hawaii. The original element, from Clark Air Force base remains in Guam until the next flight back to Clark Air Base. The Guam security element escort Marcos et al to Hawaii, then wait for the next flight back to Guam.

In the second scenario, the Clark security element rides all the way from the Philippines to Hawaii.

Even if Air Force Amy's duty assignment claims were true, she still wouldn't have been assigned to Marcos' security element.

Based on this information, what's Air Force Amy's true background with regards to the Air Force?

HBO's Cathouse Series' Air Force Amy--Possible Realities with Regards to her Claims

Here's the best case scenario:

She did serve in the Air Force for 5 years. She achieved the rank of Senior Airman. She earned 4 ribbon/medal awards during that time: Air Force Good Conduct Medal, Air Force Longevity Award, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon, and Air Force Training Ribbon. She was an average, run of the mill Airman that used sex politics to get cushy job assignments. She spent her operational time at Nellis Air Force Base at Las Vegas.

Here's another scenario:

Air Force Amy gets washed out of Air Force basic training. Or, she did serve, but not for her entire contract.

Here's the worst case scenario: She never served.

Red flags go up the more you read her Air Force claims.

First, she's quick to brag about what she accomplished. She offers this out of the blue, not in defense against someone questioning her veteran status.

Second, when she does brag, she sounds like she's reciting something. Both, tone of voice and facial features, become tense. She ends up sounding "robotic."

Third, she claimed awards that she couldn't have earned, given her time in service. Phony veterans are notorious for claiming medals that:

* Weren't authorized for the period that contains their time of service...
* Were authorized before they served...
* Weren't around until after they got out of service...
* They didn't earn at all, for the above three reasons, and for the fact that they didn't serve...

It's like the phony Vietnam veteran, in his 60s, wearing the Word War II victory medal.

Fourth, there's a mismatch between her stories and her claimed awards. For instance, the Meritorious Service Medal is usually awarded to senior NCOs and Officers. She was only a Senior Airman.

She claimed the John Levitow Award, which is awarded at a leadership course. Her profile ribbon rack is missing another award that she would've gotten for going to this course. This ribbon is awarded for successful attendance at a leadership course.

Fifth, she embellishes what she did, and stretches things out of proportion.
Her claims, about what she did with regards to being an instructor, don't match with similar claims of people who've been through similar training.

Sixth, she gives conflicting stories as to why she got out of the Air Force. A real veteran would've given a consistent story... even if they wanted to hide the circumstances behind their getting out.

Seventh, her administrative claims don't match actual military procedures. For example, DOD FMRs govern all branches of the service when it comes to pay and finance. The one covering separations, to include DOD travel regulations, specify that discharged people are given money to pay for their way to the place they entered active duty. If they're not given money, they're given a government ticket for a trip back to the home of record.

Eighth, the retention personnel would've tried to work her wishes. They would've been the same ones that told her that her wishes wouldn't be possible. The CO could give base level, or unit level, re-enlistment level incentives.

Ninth, her profile places her at conflicting units of assignment. These assignment periods don't support her claims of when she served.

She lists herself at three different places from 1983 to 1987. One of those places wasn't activated until 2 years after she "got out." The second two are in Las Vegas, which takes her out of the equation when it came to the Marcos ouster. Her final assignment runs from 84 to 89, at Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii. This puts her in conflict with her first three listed assignments.

The College Graduate, Who'd Reject a Six Figure Salary Job, is an Idiot--So is the Woman That'll Reject the Best Service She Could've Gotten

A reporter at the Occupy Wall Street rally asks a young woman a question. If one of the CEOs came down, met her, and offered her a $100,000.00 a year job, would she accept it? Her answer was an emphatic "No!"

The scene shifts back to the news panel talking about the movement. A woman on that panel comments; had that been her daughter, and her daughter replied that way, she'd smack that daughter.

The woman that said "no" was with a group of college students. They lambasted the top 1% of the income earners in the US. What was the reporter's point with her question? Those "one percenters" worked hard to get to where they were at. Why penalize them for their success, by forcing them to just "give away" more of what they earned?

Another major point behind the reporter's question...

How willing were many of these demonstrators to open the door should opportunity knock? The scenario represented in that reporter's question would be a godsend to most. This'd be true whether we're talking about a fresh graduate out of college, or an unemployed American.

So you could understand why most people would smack such an idiot... especially one that slams the door shut on opportunity's face.

The unemployment rate was at least 9% during that scene. In reality, more people were unemployed.

You simply don't turn such an opportunity away. Unfortunately, this situation plays itself out across the country, across multiple scenarios. Money isn't always a factor either.

Receiving real, good quality, service is another experience that a minority of the women in the world enjoys. Most women complain that men tend to take on the "it's all about me" attitude in the bedroom.

The reviews that men do on their experiences with these women compliment that argument. Most guys think that giving any attention would matter, regardless of how little time it takes compared to the rest of their time. Many men actually believe their assumptions:  "I body worshiped her for 3 minutes, and she absolutely loved it!"

The reality is that it takes patience, and a willingness to take one's time, to give a woman desirable results. This devotion to the woman's domina needs results in her experiencing the rushes she dreams of most the time... or orgasms she wished she should experience.

Most women sadly go to the grave not knowing what real domination is like. They spend the majority of their transit, to the grave, complaining about selfish subs thinking that it's about the sub.

Sure, they've met some guys who did good for them. But, unless you experience the real thing, you'd simply not know.

There's a domina that slammed the door on opportunity when it came knocking.

Most dominas are humble. They understand that they remain in business because of subs. Apparently, there are certain dominas who'd refuse to see certain subs... to punish those who dare have a different political stance... or who dare stand up for themselves.

This one Mistress pulled excuses out of her ass for her not wanting to see me. None of her excuses held any water.

There's no evidence that she read my reply, so I don't feel bad about putting it here.

These women will go to the grave never experiencing real pleasure. They're doomed to spend the rest of their lives being a sub's pleasure tool. Many of these women complain about men instead of looking at the mirror for the real solution.

The below post shows my response to her blatant lies...

Response to Dingbat Domina That Called me by my First Name

[quote] From: [XXX]
Date: May 06, 2011 10:41 PM
Subject: RE: Hi [XXX], this is herfacechair from ECCIE... Hi [My real name], 

I do out-calls only for well established clients after several meetings. I do not know my schedule towards the end of the month but I can tell you that in KC I am frequently booked in full by existing clientele. I have taken the opportunity to read some of your postings on ECCIE and your reviews. Your reviews most all mention DATO and/or other activities in that area that I do not find pleasurable. After careful consideration, I will kindly thank you for the compliment of wanting to see me professionally, however, I will politely decline. I would rather not have you disappointed and frankly, I don't feel we would be a good match professionally. I know myself and my preferences well enough to advise you to spend your hard earned dollars where they may bring you the greatest reward - and I do not beleive that would be with me in this particular instance. 

Again, my deepest and sincere thanks for your consideration. I wish you all the best.

-- Dingbat  [/quote]

Calling me by my first name? Really?

That's something reserved for fetish models who've actually done sessions with me. After a couple of decent sessions, I'd be comfortable with them calling me by my first name. If they did one real good session with me, they could call me by my real name after we're done.

Fetish models who've never done sessions with me, or who no longer intend to do sessions with me, must call me by my username name... just as I'm expected to call them by theirs.

A real woman, worth her salt, will do an outcall with a hobbyist that's established in the hobby. A woman that's not flexible enough to leave her comfort zone... for a proven hobbyist... sends a message that she thinks she's God's gift to mankind, and that her shit doesn't stink.

The above woman's reply is riddled with inconsistencies, and fallacies.

She claims that she's always booked when she goes to Kansas City. Her in-call location wasn't that far from there. One day, she planned on going on a tour, to include a city in Kansas. She called a woman in that location, to do some research.

Let's step back and look at this from a business person's standpoint.

If she's completely "booked" on her Kansas City trips, it'd make business sense for her to always cater to Kansas City. Why call someone, in another area, to find out what the market is? Why go for the unknown when you're right next to a tribute fountain that keeps on giving?

Better yet, why go to an area that traditionally won't compensate her at anywhere near the tribute rate she gets in Kansas City?

If she's constantly booked whenever she goes to Kansas City, she wouldn't be moving to different locations. She'd be going to Kansas City all the time. That's where the tributes are.

Why go to the other locations?

She'd do it to do what other models would do... to turn the tribute fountain up. After all, why even spend the money on gas, lodging and dining if she didn't expect to receive enough tribute? The time she spends going to Wichita or Lincoln could be spent on a "booked" schedule in Kansas City.

Sounds like someone is just pumping one excuse out after another.

"I have taken the opportunity to read some of your postings on ECCIE and your reviews. Your reviews most all mention DATO and/or other activities in that area that I do not find pleasurable." -- Ding Dong

I doubt that she read my reviews and postings. She probably skimmed over them, or she didn't read them at all. Why? As of the time she replied, I had 9 reviews. Only one mentioned DATO.

Since she said that my reviews all mention DATO or related activities, she obviously didn't read my reviews. The only other related activity to DATO is Greek. None of my reviews mention Greek, because I don't do that. It's a hard limit.

She also mentioned that she took the liberty to read my other posts on ECCIE. It's obvious that she's a liberal. I've consistently argued as a conservative, both in the regional and national forums. We've also taken different positions on the board after I replied to the above quote.

So here's the reality. She didn't refuse to see me for the reasons that she stated. She refused to see me for my conservative stance, and for my strong and powerful performance against the liberals... and against her friends.

This is the same woman that refused to see another strong conservative on that message board... surprise surprise!

I wouldn't be surprised if she had issues with me, as a conservative, standing up for myself instead of backing down. She may be the type that likes the doormat guys.

Either way, her excuses didn't fly.

Nope, there was no "careful consideration" on her part. As far as she was concerned, my proposal was dead on arrival.

There's no way that she could decline my invitation politely. Lying isn't polite.

Her actions speak volumes about her real intentions. She doesn't pay attention to detail. If she could fail to pay attention to detail on my reviews, where she can't see most the review; then she might fail to pay attention to detail when it came to where it really mattered... what I love to get accomplished during a session.

Her reply also suggests another thing. That this is all about her, rather than the client:

"...or other activities in that area that I do not find pleasurable." - Dingbat

So she's right, my time and resources were spent elsewhere... like on a REAL woman in the hobby. I'm glad that I found this out this way, rather than after I've spent my money. Her service would've probably been so bad that I would've broken her "no review" policy in one of the locker room forums.

Yup, this model knows her preferences all right... she knows that as a liberal, she won't see real conservatives... or... she'd rather see people that allow themselves to be treated like a doormat. As someone that's full of herself, she won't see someone that wouldn't kiss the ground she walked on at ECCIE.

For this Ding Dong, it's all about her, not her client.

Smart models don't try to sound pompous on a rejection note. They'd also own up to the fact that they're writing those responses... instead of blaming an alleged administrative assistant.