Disclaimers from other websites extend to this blog

By reading this blog, you bind yourself to the disclaimers of the websites that this blog addresses. You also bind yourself to Blogger's and Google's disclaimers. I have copyright to my comments.

Friday, April 24, 2015

Mistress Bella destroyed on Mistress Destiny Femdom Forums, Strikes Victor on her Findom Mistress Bella Blog



<blockquote>Mistess S., Also Known As Mistress Bella of Findom Mistress Bella, farts this out:
Sounds a lot like a member called herfacechair on the Mistress Destiny forum. That guy is such an arrogant tool.</blockquote>

Mistress Bella, aka Mistress S., you have absolutely no clue about what you're talking about.

First, I've seen Head Mistress Porsche Lynn, Mz. Lizza, and Mistress Domina Katie for facesitting sessions. None of my interactions with them, before, during, or after our sessions, were remotely close to the transaction that happened in your blog post. None of the 3 have shut me off from future service.

I read their websites thoroughly before I approached them about my specific fetish. With Head Mistress Porsche Lynn, I already knew that she'd cater to that fetish.

I didn't try to talk them down, nor did I try to dictate to them how they should do their jobs as mistresses. Instead, I was thorough about what I was looking for in a session while remaining within bounds listed in their website.

Second, I've never attempted to contact you for a session, so you don't have a leg to stand on telling people that the guy that interacted with you is anything like me.

My pointing out my military credentials, in a military related debate, against your lack of said credentials, doesn't constitute arrogance on my part. Your insinuating that your interactions with other possible veterans "gives you equal standing" in that debate demonstrated your arrogance.  

Third, don't dismiss my refusal, to accept hearsay on your part as equivalent to my first-hand military experiences, as my being "arrogant." It's simply me refusing to give any standing to what you've heard from people that you think are veterans... When compared to my first-hand military experiences.

There's simply no equivalent standing, not even remote. My refusing to see it that way does not constitute my being "arrogant."

Don't dismiss my refusal, to accept your interactions with "veterans" as equivalent to me actually being a veteran, as my being "arrogant." You cannot even tell whether or not someone was a veteran just by talking to them if you don't have military experience of your own. That's not me being "arrogant," that's me giving you a fact.

Again, it's me refusing to see any equivalent standing to you "being" with "veterans" as being "equivalent" to my actually being a veteran.

The fact of the matter is that we were debating on a military and war related topic. You are the civilian, with no military experience, to my being a war veteran... In a thread where both veterans and war were talked about.

My pointing that out, as it relates to the argument, does not make me "arrogant."

You didn't like the fact that I had experiences and knowledge relevant to what we were arguing about... as opposed to the opinion that you had that you were trying to elevate.

My refusal, to see any equivalent standing between us, is not me being "arrogant." It's my refusing to allow you to ride your countrymen's, and mine, coattails in an attempt to give validity to your standing in this specific debate.

If anything, arrogance is what drove you to do that. You're too arrogant to admit, or even to acknowledge, that I had a better vantage point then you, and that I had more credibility than you, in the argument we were engaged in.

Your arrogance attempted to diminish my standing and to elevate yours. You would not have done this if you weren't arrogant. Arrogance drove you to take a swipe at me on your site. Your arrogance blinded you to the fact that you were arguing with a war veteran on a topic that talked about war and veterans... Something that related to that war veteran's first-hand experience against your lack of it.

In fact, arrogance radiated from that Findom Mistress Bella post and comment... and from your Mistress Destiny Femdom Forum posts during that debate. You've done what other people, that I've debated with have done before, deflect your traits onto the person that's hammering you.

Fourth, don't mistake my sticking to the facts, logic, reason, and the debate topic as my being "arrogant." Let's face it, I destroyed you in debate on Mistress Destiny Femdom Forums. You couldn't get your way with me on that thread, so you stomped over to your blog, Findom Mistress Bella, and took a swipe at me.

Fifth, what I told you in the debate we had prior to you making the above comment on your blog:

"My approach is simple. Take stepoverme58's and your posts, then dismantle and prove them wrong, or call them into question, point by point and using facts, reason, and logic. That doesn't make me 'arrogant' or 'conceited.'" -- herfacechair, 2013

I highly recommend that you pull your head out of your butt and accept the fact that you, and someone that you sided with on Mistress Destiny Femdom Forums, got your azzes handed to you in debate.

Yes, I understand that this is almost 2 years old, but guess what? As I stated on that thread that I hammered you on:

"I'll tell you the same thing that I told trail back in 2005/2006. I'll rebut you even if I don't get back with you within the next 24 hours, the next 48 hours, the next 96 hours, the next week, the next month, the next year, the next decade, etc." -- herfacechair, 2013

Hence, this 2015 reply to your 2013 Findom Mistress Bella blog post.