I did the research, and here's what I found.
The media ran into a password protected al Qaeda message board. Like this forum, or forums that take the "vbforum" format, people can post anonymously. Now, on craigslist, people are familiar with posters that hijack other poster's names.
For instance, the buttlicker and nawfik imposter posts, or posts from whites claiming to be blacks.
This also happens on other kinds of forums, people will post claiming to be someone they're not. This is precisely what happened with that one al Qaeda message board that the media zeroed in on. One of the members expressed hope that McCain would win, "to keep the troops in Iraq."
There are two major problems with that.
First, al Qaeda wants us out, they want us to withdraw, not stay there. Their actions, since we invaded Iraq, were designed to achieve that goal. Second, people can go on these forums and say just about anything.
Just like the white guy posting as a black guy here, we have an anti Republican talking out of his arse on that board.
Strange? Obama received the majority of the Arab and Islamic votes in this country.
Right after the press reported that, an actual member of al Qaeda came out and said this:
"O God, humiliate Bush and his party, O Lord of the Worlds, degrade and defy him."-Abu Yahya al-Libi, al Qaeda
That statement is consistent with their actions and their official statements.
Iraq was no mistake, it was a strategically brilliant move for the reasons I explained when I posted here last.
If you claim that Iraq was a lie, a mistake, etc, you're doing something equivalent to smacking the troops on the face. These actions are also equivalent to spitting on every service member that has ever served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. By logical extension, those statements are equivalent to spitting on the grave of every service member that died in Iraq.
The majority of the troops that have ever served in Iraq don't see Iraq as a lie or a mistake. Now, when we have majorities of the people that have been there say something different than what those who've never been there say, that should give you something to think about.
Even Obama's honoring an agreement that allowed the US to stay in Iraq till the end of 2011. So you can't just zero in on the Republicans.
As for Russia, they wouldn't be dumb enough to launch a surprise attack on the United States, regardless of what Palin or any other Republican says. They have the numbers over us, but we have more combat experience, better quality and better technology than they do. The Russian military is also bogged down in its own version of "Iraq." Hint: It's not Georgia.
As for how thin our military is, perhaps you were also complaining about how thin our military was in the 1990s? No? Well, many people in the military were complaining about how the military was stretched far and thin back in the 1990s.
The big difference between then and now is that troop moral is currently high and the troops have missions they believe in.
You spewed:
Yes, its 100% true! Al Qaeda believes that McCain will likely continue George Bush dumb military ways! Its sad Iraq was a big lie! The bad thing is when you find out you made a mistake then admit! Oh no! Dumb Republicans would rather let more people die. Things better improve because if Russia feels threaten enough to pull a surprise attack (cough....Palin's dumb ass mouth) then you'll find out how thin our military really is.
No comments:
Post a Comment